Cloud ser­vices in healthcare

C5 cer­ti­fi­ca­te as the key to compliance

The Ger­man Digi­tal Act (Digital-Gesetz) allows the use of cloud ser­vices in the health­ca­re sec­tor, but only under strict con­di­ti­ons. Cloud pro­vi­ders may only offer their ser­vices if they have obtai­ned a C5 cer­ti­fi­ca­te from the Fede­ral Office for Infor­ma­ti­on Secu­ri­ty (BSI). If a cloud pro­vi­der uses the ser­vices of third par­ties, it must be che­cked whe­ther a C5 cer­ti­fi­ca­te is required.

C5 cer­ti­fi­ca­te

Accor­ding to Sec­tion 393 (3) No. 2 of Book V of the Ger­man Social Code (SGB V), cloud pro­vi­ders must pre­sent a C5 cer­ti­fi­ca­te for their cloud sys­tems and tech­no­lo­gies. The cer­ti­fi­ca­te con­firms that all rele­vant secu­ri­ty and data pro­tec­tion requi­re­ments have been met. The cer­ti­fi­ca­te is based on the BSI C5:2020 cri­te­ria cata­lo­gue, which com­pri­ses a total of 125 cri­te­ria from 17 sub­ject are­as and is divi­ded into basic and addi­tio­nal requirements.

Who is responsible?

The pri­ma­ry addres­sees of the SGB V obli­ga­ti­on are cloud pro­vi­ders. The­se often use third-party ser­vices for various com­pon­ents. The­re is a deba­te as to whe­ther a cloud pro­vi­der must pro­vi­de a cer­ti­fi­ca­te from the third par­ty or an addi­tio­nal cer­ti­fi­ca­te of its own.  Alt­hough the wor­ding of the pro­vi­si­on of SGB V is open and the­re are dif­fe­ring opi­ni­ons, the spi­rit and pur­po­se of the regu­la­ti­on, which is to ensu­re com­pre­hen­si­ve data pro­tec­tion, and the C5 cri­te­ria cata­lo­gue, which con­ta­ins spe­ci­fic requi­re­ments for the use of sub­ser­vice pro­vi­ders, pro­vi­de an over­all solu­ti­on. It requi­res both the cloud pro­vi­der and the sub­ser­vice pro­vi­der used to be C5 certified.

Prac­ti­cal implementation

Cloud pro­vi­ders have two opti­ons for sub­mit­ting a C5 cer­ti­fi­ca­te: With the inclu­si­ve method, the pro­vi­der includes the sub­ser­vice pro­vi­der’s secu­ri­ty mea­su­res in its own C5 audit. With the carve-out method, the secu­ri­ty mea­su­res of the sub­ser­vice pro­vi­der are excluded and veri­fied by a cer­ti­fi­ca­te from the sub­ser­vice pro­vi­der. In prac­ti­ce, the carve-out approach is recom­men­ded. It allows cloud pro­vi­ders to focus on their own secu­ri­ty mea­su­res, which has bene­fits such as mini­mi­zing cost and effort.

With the Ger­man C5 equi­va­lence regu­la­ti­on, alter­na­ti­ve secu­ri­ty cer­ti­fi­ca­tes can now be reco­gni­zed as equi­va­lent to the C5 cer­ti­fi­ca­te. Alter­na­ti­ves are ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 27001 (based on the BSI stan­dard “IT-Grundschutz”) or the Cloud Con­trols Matrix ver­si­on 4.0. An addi­tio­nal requi­re­ment is the sub­mis­si­on of a detail­ed action plan.

Addi­tio­nal requi­re­ment: Trans­fer to third countries

In addi­ti­on to the C5 cer­ti­fi­ca­te, Sec­tion 393 SGB V con­ta­ins a ter­ri­to­ri­al rest­ric­tion on data pro­ces­sing. Health data may only be pro­ces­sed within the Euro­pean Uni­on (EU), the Euro­pean Eco­no­mic Area, Switz­er­land, or count­ries for which the EU Com­mis­si­on has issued an ade­quacy decis­i­on. For US cloud pro­vi­ders, cer­ti­fi­ca­ti­on under the Data Pri­va­cy Frame­work Pro­gram is also requi­red, even if the cur­rent ade­quacy decis­i­on for the US is in place.

Fazit

Cloud pro­vi­ders need their own C5 cer­ti­fi­ca­te. The C5 cer­ti­fi­ca­ti­on of sub­pro­vi­ders must also be che­cked. The pri­va­te­ly main­tai­ned list ‘BSI C5 Atte­sta­ti­ons’ pro­vi­des an over­view of which pro­vi­ders hold a C5 certificate.

back

Stay up-to-date

We use your email address exclusively for sending our newsletter. You have the right to revoke your consent at any time with effect for the future. For further information, please refer to our privacy policy.