Envi­ron­men­tal claims under the Emp­Co Direc­ti­ve (EU) 2024/825

The end of green­wa­shing is here

Start­ing August 2026, strict regu­la­ti­ons will app­ly to envi­ron­men­tal claims regar­ding pro­ducts and brands. Adver­ti­sing con­tent aimed at the envi­ron­men­tal com­pa­ti­bi­li­ty of pro­ducts will be ban­ned wit­hout solid evidence.

The EU Emp­Co Direc­ti­ve (Empowe­ring Con­su­mers, EU 2024/825) intro­du­ces pro­found chan­ges for mar­ke­ting. Through the­se amend­ments, the EU aims to pave the way toward a green eco­no­my. For prac­ti­cal busi­ness ope­ra­ti­ons, this means that the requi­re­ments for envi­ron­men­tal adver­ti­sing will increase dra­sti­cal­ly. In the Ger­man Unfair Com­pe­ti­ti­on Act (UWG), the­se stric­ter rules will enter into force on Sep­tem­ber 27, 2026 – howe­ver, com­pa­nies should review their mar­ke­ting mate­ri­als right now.

The Ban on Gene­ric Envi­ron­men­tal Claims

The­se adjus­t­ments are high­ly explo­si­ve becau­se, under No. 4a of the Annex to the UWG, making an unsub­stan­tia­ted gene­ric envi­ron­men­tal cla­im will con­sti­tu­te an unlawful com­mer­cial prac­ti­ce. Accor­ding to the EU Com­mis­si­on’s FAQs, even a simp­le green leaf or a water dro­p­let can con­sti­tu­te such an envi­ron­men­tal cla­im that requi­res pro­of if the con­text sup­ports this inter­pre­ta­ti­on. The ban also appli­es if the envi­ron­men­tal cla­im is only impli­ed by the circumstances.

The law defi­nes the core cri­te­ria as follows:

  • Envi­ron­men­tal Cla­im: Any vol­un­t­a­ry mar­ke­ting state­ment (text, image, sym­bol, brand name) that expli­cit­ly or impli­cit­ly sug­gests a pro­duct has a posi­ti­ve envi­ron­men­tal impact or is less harmful than competitors.
  • Gene­ric Envi­ron­men­tal Cla­im: A cla­im that is neither based on a per­mis­si­ble sus­taina­bi­li­ty label nor cle­ar­ly and pro­min­ent­ly spe­ci­fied on the exact same mar­ke­ting medi­um. Examp­les include terms like “envi­ron­men­tal­ly fri­end­ly,” “climate-friendly,” “eco­lo­gi­cal,” “eco-safe,” or “biode­gra­da­ble.”
  • Sus­taina­bi­li­ty Label: Self-invented labels will be ban­ned in the future. Only labels based on inde­pen­dent cer­ti­fi­ca­ti­on sys­tems with third-party moni­to­ring or estab­lished by public aut­ho­ri­ties will be permitted.

What Remains Permitted?

Con­ver­se­ly, com­mer­cial prac­ti­ces remain gene­ral­ly per­mis­si­ble if they fall into one of the fol­lo­wing categories:

  1. Spe­ci­fied Envi­ron­men­tal Claims: The cla­im is cle­ar­ly, pro­min­ent­ly, and con­cre­te­ly bro­ken down on the exact same medium.
  2. Per­mis­si­ble Sus­taina­bi­li­ty Labels: Qua­li­ty marks that meet the legal requi­re­ments for independence.
  3. Pro­ven Envi­ron­men­tal Per­for­mance: Gene­ric claims for which a reco­gni­zed excel­lent envi­ron­men­tal per­for­mance can be pro­ven. This pro­of can be pro­vi­ded, for exam­p­le, through the EU Eco­la­bel (Regu­la­ti­on (EC) No 66/2010) or offi­ci­al­ly reco­gni­zed envi­ron­men­tal labels (accor­ding to DIN EN ISO 14024 Type I, such as the “Blue Angel”).

Com­pli­ance

Cru­cial for com­pli­ance: The spe­ci­fic label must actual­ly sup­port the exact cla­im being made. For ins­tance, an ener­gy con­sump­ti­on label can­not sup­port a cla­im like “manu­fac­tu­red in a resource-saving man­ner.” In addi­ti­on to the new pro­hi­bi­ti­ons in the Annex, the gene­ral rules of the UWG (espe­ci­al­ly the pro­hi­bi­ti­on of mis­lea­ding prac­ti­ces) remain ful­ly applicable.

back

Stay up-to-date

We use your email address exclusively for sending our newsletter. You have the right to revoke your consent at any time with effect for the future. For further information, please refer to our privacy policy.