Pro­duct regu­la­ti­on as part of a tech­no­lo­gi­cal decoupling?

In Sep­tem­ber 2024, the US Depart­ment of Commerce’s Bureau of Indus­try and Secu­ri­ty (BIS) published a pro­po­sal for a US-wide ban on the sale and import of ‘con­nec­ted vehic­les’ and cor­re­spon­ding (soft­ware) com­pon­ents if they have a signi­fi­cant con­nec­tion to Rus­sia or Chi­na. With the­se trade rest­ric­tions, the US govern­ment aims to com­pen­sa­te for com­pe­ti­ti­ve dis­ad­van­ta­ges for the US and to pre­vent pos­si­ble data pro­tec­tion vio­la­ti­ons or even cyber attacks. It can be assu­med that the far-reaching rest­ric­tions will affect almost all US com­pa­nies in the auto­mo­ti­ve indus­try and their sup­p­ly chains. On 16 Janu­ary 2025, the final text of this regu­la­ti­on was published in the Fede­ral Regis­ter of the US govern­ment and includes some adjus­t­ments com­pared to the draft.

(Initi­al­ly) only pas­sen­ger cars affected

The US government’s ori­gi­nal aim was to cover almost all new vehic­les under the regu­la­ti­on, with regard to soft­ware from model year 2027 and with regard to hard­ware from model year 2030 (for vehic­le units wit­hout a model year from 1 Janu­ary 2029). The final ver­si­on limits the scope of appli­ca­ti­on exclu­si­ve­ly to pas­sen­ger cars weig­hing up to 4,536 kilo­grams or 10,000 pounds.

This means that com­mer­cial vehic­les, such as buses or trucks, are not cover­ed by the regu­la­ti­on. In addi­ti­on, vehic­les that do not pri­ma­ri­ly use public roads (agri­cul­tu­ral vehic­les or mining vehic­les) are excluded. Howe­ver, the BIS alre­a­dy announ­ced sepa­ra­te regu­la­ti­ons for tho­se types of vehic­les that are not affec­ted by the cur­rent regulation.

A broad under­stan­ding of ‘con­nec­ted vehic­les’ and con­nec­tions to Rus­sia and China

Accor­ding to the US govern­ment, risks ari­se if (natu­ral per­sons or legal enti­ties from Rus­sia or Chi­na have been ‘invol­ved’ in the deve­lo­p­ment or manu­fac­tu­re of cer­tain vehic­le com­pon­ents. In this con­text, sub­si­dia­ries of US com­pa­nies are also cover­ed if they are based in Rus­sia or Chi­na and are estab­lished and orga­nis­ed under the laws of tho­se count­ries. In the future, the (inten­tio­nal) sale of con­nec­ted vehic­les in the US will be pro­hi­bi­ted if they con­tain cer­tain hard­ware or soft­ware com­pon­ents that are desi­gned, deve­lo­ped, manu­fac­tu­red or sup­pli­ed by per­sons with a suf­fi­ci­ent nexus to Chi­na or Rus­sia. The regu­la­ti­on appli­es even if the vehic­le was manu­fac­tu­red or com­ple­ted in the US. The ban also extends to the import of such vehic­les and the import of VCS hardware.

The broad defi­ni­ti­on of ‘con­nec­ted vehic­les’ means that it does not mat­ter whe­ther vehic­les can com­mu­ni­ca­te with each other. Rather, it is suf­fi­ci­ent that they are capa­ble of Blue­tooth, WiFi or satel­li­te recep­ti­on, for exam­p­le. This includes soft­ware or hard­ware that pri­ma­ri­ly enables com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on from and to con­nec­ted vehic­les and can also con­trol sub­or­di­na­te sys­tems in the vehic­le. In par­ti­cu­lar, this appli­es to ‘VCS’ (vehic­le con­nec­ti­vi­ty sys­tems) and ‘ADS’ (auto­ma­ted dri­ving sys­tems). The defi­ni­ti­on includes, for exam­p­le, soft­ware that is sub­ject to for­eign owner­ship inte­rests of any kind. By con­trast, soft­ware that mere­ly sup­ports the­se func­tions is no lon­ger cover­ed by the final regu­la­ti­on. Simi­lar­ly, ADS hard­ware is excluded from the scope of application.

New com­pli­ance requirements

Importers of VCS hard­ware and manu­fac­tu­r­ers of vehic­les that use VCS hard­ware or con­tain the affec­ted soft­ware are requi­red to sub­mit Decla­ra­ti­ons of Con­for­mi­ty. It must be assu­red that the com­pa­ny has not been invol­ved in any pro­hi­bi­ted acti­vi­ty. Records rela­ted to the Decla­ra­ti­ons of Con­for­mi­ty must be retai­ned for ten years. In addi­ti­on, the records should be atta­ched to each rele­vant tran­sac­tion, tog­e­ther with fur­ther sup­port­ing docu­ments (con­tracts, import docu­ments, sales invoices, etc.).

Out­look

Affec­ted com­pa­nies will imme­dia­te­ly have to tho­rough­ly review their sup­p­ly chains. Any deter­mi­ned con­nec­tion to Rus­sia or Chi­na (which will be pro­hi­bi­ted in the future) can have signi­fi­cant con­se­quen­ces. It may be neces­sa­ry to chan­ge the pro­duct port­fo­lio and/or switch sup­pli­ers at short noti­ce. Sup­p­ly chain risk assess­ments and com­pli­ance manage­ment sys­tems will also have to take the­se aspects into account as a pre­ven­ti­ve measure.

Con­clu­si­on

The Biden administration’s pro­po­sal of Sep­tem­ber 2024 had alre­a­dy recei­ved bipar­ti­san appr­oval; the­r­e­fo­re, it is not to be expec­ted that the ban will be over­tur­ned by the new gover­ment from Janu­ary, but rather, that it will take effect in mid-March 2025. A detail­ed artic­le, which, howe­ver, still deals with the pro­po­sal of the regu­la­ti­on from Sep­tem­ber 2024, can be found on the web­site of our coope­ra­ti­on law firm Foley Lard­ner LLP.

The BIS press release on the final ver­si­on is available at the fol­lo­wing link.

back

Stay up-to-date

We use your email address exclusively for sending our newsletter. You have the right to revoke your consent at any time with effect for the future. For further information, please refer to our privacy policy.