reusch­law White­pa­per: Com­pen­sa­bi­li­ty of per­son­nel cos­ts in the event of defects

If a defec­ti­ve deli­very occurs, action often needs to be taken quick­ly to pre­vent fur­ther dama­ge. The­re is usual­ly no time for a mutu­al preli­mi­na­ry cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on of respon­si­bi­li­ties and com­pe­ten­ci­es. It is the­r­e­fo­re not uncom­mon for the cus­to­mer to deploy per­son­nel to reme­dy the defect—e.g., for qua­li­ty inspec­tion, sort­ing, rewor­king, or car­ry­ing out recalls—without first cla­ri­fy­ing with the sup­pli­er whe­ther the lat­ter will bear the costs. 

This often leads to dis­cus­sions about who will bear the cos­ts, espe­ci­al­ly if the cus­to­mer demands reim­bur­se­ment for the cos­ts of its own per­son­nel. This artic­le out­lines the legal situa­ti­on and solu­ti­ons for the­se conflict-prone situations.

In this white­pa­per, Paul Deh­ner, Thors­ten Deeg and Dani­el Wuhr­mann out­lines the legal frame­work and pos­si­ble solu­ti­ons for the­se conflict-prone situations.

Down­load

reuschlaw Whitepaper | Compensability of personnel costs in the event of defects
Authors: Daniel Wuhrmann / Thorsten Deeg

reusch­law White­pa­per | Com­pen­sa­bi­li­ty of per­son­nel cos­ts in the event of defects

Aut­hors: Dani­el Wuhr­mann / Thors­ten Deeg

back

Stay up-to-date

We use your email address exclusively for sending our newsletter. You have the right to revoke your consent at any time with effect for the future. For further information, please refer to our privacy policy.