reusch­law White­pa­per: Lia­bi­li­ty for cus­to­mer specifications

Lia­bi­li­ty for cus­to­mer spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons from the per­spec­ti­ve of an auto­mo­ti­ve supplier

In the auto­mo­ti­ve indus­try, clo­se coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween ori­gi­nal equip­ment manufactur-ers (OEMs) and sup­pli­ers is essen­ti­al. The OEM typi­cal­ly assu­mes over­all responsibil-ity for the vehic­le con­cept, pro­vi­des the sup­pli­er with func­tion­al requi­re­ments and often also spe­ci­fies spe­ci­fic tech­ni­cal requi­re­ments for indi­vi­du­al com­pon­ents. The sup­pli­ers, in turn, imple­ment the­se requi­re­ments and deve­lop the cor­re­spon­ding com­pon­ents, which then pro­ceed to series production.

The divi­si­on of duties rai­ses important ques­ti­ons regar­ding the allo­ca­ti­on of liability: 

  • Is the sup­pli­er lia­ble for design defects if the­se are based on bin­ding spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons pro-vided by the OEM? 
  • Is the sup­pli­er obli­ged to cri­ti­cal­ly exami­ne the specifications? 
  • And is the sup­pli­er lia­ble for dama­ge resul­ting from such specifications?

In this white­pa­per, Thors­ten Deeg and Dani­el Wuhr­mann out­line the con­di­ti­ons under which a sup­pli­er can be exempt from lia­bi­li­ty for design defects, par­ti­cu­lar­ly when the­se defects are based on bin­ding spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons from the OEM, and high­lights the signi­fi­can­ce of the Stutt­gart Regio­nal Cour­t’s case law in this context.

Whitepaper | Liability for customer specifications from the perspective of an automotive supplier
Authors: Daniel Wuhrmann / Thorsten Deeg

White­pa­per | Lia­bi­li­ty for cus­to­mer spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons from the per­spec­ti­ve of an auto­mo­ti­ve supplier
Aut­hors: Dani­el Wuhr­mann / Thors­ten Deeg

back

Stay up-to-date

We use your email address exclusively for sending our newsletter. You have the right to revoke your consent at any time with effect for the future. For further information, please refer to our privacy policy.