Swift cri­ti­cism of the draft fast-charging law

The draft aims to com­bat mar­ket failure

On 28 Decem­ber 2020, the Fede­ral Minis­try of Trans­port pre­sen­ted the draft bill for a fast-charging law (draft law on the pro­vi­si­on of com­pre­hen­si­ve fast-charging infra­struc­tu­re for pure bat­tery elec­tric vehic­les). The ratio­na­le behind this is that Ger­ma­ny can only achie­ve its cli­ma­te pro­tec­tion tar­gets through signi­fi­cant CO2 savings in the trans­port sec­tor. To this end, the elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on of road trans­port is par­ti­cu­lar­ly essen­ti­al. Howe­ver, imple­men­ta­ti­on is not pro­gres­sing to the desi­red ext­ent. The reason for this is the ‘dilem­ma bet­ween cau­se and effect’: the ina­de­qua­te char­ging infra­struc­tu­re makes elec­tric vehic­les appear less attrac­ti­ve, and the resul­ting low sales mar­ket for such vehic­les is attri­bu­ta­ble to the ina­de­qua­te char­ging infrastructure.

The Fede­ral Govern­ment intends to coun­ter this stale­ma­te by pro­vi­ding ‘com­pre­hen­si­ve, needs-based fast-charging infra­struc­tu­re for purely battery-powered elec­tric vehic­les’. The main pro­vi­si­ons of the Fast Char­ging Act are as follows:

  • The fede­ral govern­ment will deter­mi­ne the demand and then defi­ne at least ten regio­nal lots in which it will spe­ci­fy the num­ber of fast char­ging points, the equip­ment and the ancil­la­ry faci­li­ties for indi­vi­du­al locations.
  • The fede­ral govern­ment will defi­ne the tech­ni­cal, eco­no­mic and legal frame­work con­di­ti­ons for ser­vice pro­vi­si­on, which must be obser­ved by fede­ral con­trac­tors with regard to the acces­si­bi­li­ty, per­for­mance, relia­bi­li­ty, needs-based natu­re and user-friendliness of the infra­struc­tu­re offering.
  • The fede­ral govern­ment will pro­vi­de finan­cial resour­ces in the ear­ly mar­ket pha­se (mar­ket ramp-up pha­se) to ensu­re that the infra­struc­tu­re is also estab­lished in eco­no­mic­al­ly less attrac­ti­ve locations.

Signi­fi­cant cri­ti­cism of the implementation

Despi­te a very short dead­line for stake­hol­ders to sub­mit comm­ents (which ended on 5 Janu­ary 2021), some asso­cia­ti­ons expres­sed sharp cri­ti­cism (BDEW, BEM). This cri­ti­cism is aimed in par­ti­cu­lar at the sever­ely rest­ric­ted scope of appli­ca­ti­on. All regu­la­ti­ons app­ly exclu­si­ve­ly to vehic­les that are powered sole­ly by an elec­tric bat­tery. Neither exis­ting solu­ti­ons (e.g. plug-in hybrids) nor tho­se curr­ent­ly in deve­lo­p­ment (e.g. e‑trailers) or new­ly deve­lo­ped tech­no­lo­gies in the future (e.g. by means of an ope­ning clau­se) are taken into account. The­re are also tech­ni­cal con­cerns about the draft, par­ti­cu­lar­ly with regard to the fact that the plan­ned char­ging capa­ci­ty for fast char­ging points (at least 100 kV) is not set in rela­ti­on to the sys­tem vol­ta­ge level.

It is to be expec­ted that the ‘tech­ni­cal, eco­no­mic and legal frame­work con­di­ti­ons’ to be defi­ned in the future will have a signi­fi­cant impact on the indus­try. For exam­p­le, car manu­fac­tu­r­ers could limit them­sel­ves to pro­du­cing vehic­les that meet the­se requi­re­ments. This would affect the enti­re sup­p­ly chain, as sup­pli­ers would also have to ali­gn their busi­ness acti­vi­ties with the­se frame­work con­di­ti­ons in case of doubt. Ulti­m­ate­ly, the­se aspects will also be rele­vant in the draf­ting of con­tracts (e.g. with regard to agree­ments on qua­li­ty and inten­ded use) and in com­pli­ance moni­to­ring. Regard­less of the spe­ci­fic imple­men­ta­ti­on of the con­tents of the Fast Char­ging Act, legis­la­tors are requi­red to bring them into line with the exis­ting legal frame­work (e.g. in the EnWG, EMoG or LSV).

back

Stay up-to-date

We use your email address exclusively for sending our newsletter. You have the right to revoke your consent at any time with effect for the future. For further information, please refer to our privacy policy.