The new sales law and its signi­fi­can­ce for sup­pli­er contracts

The natio­nal imple­men­ta­ti­on of Direc­ti­ve (EU) 2019/771 adopted on 20 May 2019 (her­ein­af­ter, the “Sale of Goods Direc­ti­ve”) leads to far-reaching chan­ges for sales con­tracts con­cluded as of 1 Janu­ary 2022.

Alt­hough one of the main objec­ti­ves of the Sales of Goods Direc­ti­ve is to increase the level of con­su­mer pro­tec­tion, its imple­men­ta­ti­on in the Ger­man Civil Code also has impli­ca­ti­ons for busi­ness tran­sac­tions. Not only were the pro­vi­si­ons on the sale of con­su­mer goods (§§ 474 ff. of the Civil Code) amen­ded, but the gene­ral law on the sale of goods was also amen­ded. Two issues are par­ti­cu­lar­ly rele­vant for com­pa­nies: the defi­ni­ti­on of defects and the seller’s recourse.

The defi­ni­ti­on of a defect under the law of sales

In imple­men­ta­ti­on of Artic­le 5 of the Sale of Goods Direc­ti­ve, the requi­re­ments for the purcha­sed goods to be con­side­red free of mate­ri­al defects have been new­ly regu­la­ted. Pre­vious­ly, the defi­ni­ti­on of a mate­ri­al defect pri­ma­ri­ly pro­vi­ded for sub­jec­ti­ve cri­te­ria (agreed qua­li­ty, con­trac­tual­ly requi­red use) and sub­or­di­na­te­ly for objec­ti­ve cri­te­ria (sui­ta­bi­li­ty for nor­mal use) in a tie­red rela­ti­onship. Now the­se requi­re­ments are cumulative.

This poses the fol­lo­wing pro­blem for sel­lers, espe­ci­al­ly in busi­ness dealings: Alt­hough the qua­li­ty of the purcha­sed item is regu­lar­ly defi­ned in con­cre­te terms bet­ween the buy­er and the sel­ler by means of spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons or other agree­ments and the sel­ler com­pli­es with the­se, the war­ran­ty rights pro­vi­ded by law may be trig­ge­red becau­se objec­ti­ve expec­ta­ti­ons are also applicable.

This dilem­ma must be addres­sed; other­wi­se, the­re is a thre­at of war­ran­ty risks. The way to achie­ve this can only be clear and con­clu­si­ve agree­ments bet­ween the con­trac­ting par­ties, e.g. nega­ti­ve qua­li­ty agree­ments. This has always been advi­sa­ble, sin­ce sub­jec­ti­ve ide­as are by their very natu­re a gray area open to inter­pre­ta­ti­on in cases of doubt. Due to the new struc­tu­re of the Civil Code, it is now unavo­ida­ble. In this regard, stan­dard terms and con­di­ti­ons such as gene­ral terms and con­di­ti­ons and sam­ple con­tracts should also be review­ed and adapt­ed if neces­sa­ry. This also appli­es to ques­ti­ons of recour­se and limi­ta­ti­on peri­ods in the case of war­ran­ty claims:

Seller’s recour­se pur­su­ant to §§ 445 a/b of the Civil Code

It is true that Artic­le 18 of the Sale of Goods Direc­ti­ve con­ta­ins only a few pro­vi­si­ons on the seller’s recour­se against its sup­pli­er. Howe­ver, the natio­nal law­ma­kers have also adapt­ed §§ 445 a and b of the Civil Code. In this con­text, one chan­ge will have signi­fi­cant con­se­quen­ces for sup­p­ly chains: the aboli­ti­on of the maxi­mum limit on the inter­rup­ti­on of the run­ning of claims limi­ta­ti­on peri­ods in § 445b(2), Sen­tence 2 of the Civil Code (old version).

§ 445b(2) of the Civil Code sti­pu­la­tes an inter­rup­ti­on of the run­ning of limi­ta­ti­on peri­ods both for recour­se in accordance with § 445a(1) and for the gene­ral war­ran­ty claims in § 437. Accor­din­gly, the seller’s recour­se claims against (its) sup­pli­er are to expi­re at the ear­liest two months after the date on which the sel­ler ful­fills the war­ran­ty claims of its buyer.

§ 445b(2), Sen­tence 2 (old ver­si­on) pro­vi­ded for a maxi­mum time limit of five years from deli­very from the sup­pli­er to its cus­to­mer for the enforce­ment of recour­se claims. This maxi­mum peri­od has now been dele­ted wit­hout repla­ce­ment with the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the Sale of Goods Direc­ti­ve. For actors in the sup­p­ly chain, this goes hand in hand with legal uncer­tain­ty and the con­sidera­ble risk of being expo­sed to war­ran­ty claims wit­hout this maxi­mum limit. A risk that was alre­a­dy known to only a few has now been fur­ther exacerbated.


In the con­text of the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the Sale of Goods Direc­ti­ve, Ger­man law­ma­kers have deci­ded to app­ly buyer-friendly regu­la­ti­ons also to con­tracts in busi­ness tran­sac­tions strict­ly bet­ween enter­pri­ses. In this light and due to the adjus­t­ments to the law on sales shown, sup­pli­ers and manu­fac­tu­r­ers must check their own pro­ducts for com­pa­ti­bi­li­ty with the new defi­ni­ti­on of defects, (con­trac­tual­ly) safe­guard the pos­si­bi­li­ties of recour­se along the sup­p­ly chain, and adapt sam­ple con­tracts and gene­ral terms and con­di­ti­ons to the new structures.


Stay up-to-date

We use your email address exclusively for sending our newsletter. You have the right to revoke your consent at any time with effect for the future. For further information, please refer to our privacy policy.