Con­tem­pla­ting defo­re­sta­ti­on – the EU’s pro­po­sal in favour of deforestation-free glo­bal sup­ply chains

The EU’s pro­po­sal in favour of deforestation-free glo­bal sup­ply chains

Back­ground and goals

To achie­ve its stra­te­gy to make the EU eco­no­my more sus­tainab­le and cli­ma­te neu­tral (Green Deal), and in respon­se to the incre­a­sing loss and degra­dati­on of forests due to the expan­si­on of agri­cul­tu­ral land for the pro­duc­tion of cer­tain raw mate­ri­als, the Euro­pean Com­mis­si­on made a propo­sal in Novem­ber 2021 for a regu­la­ti­on on the pro­vi­si­on of cer­tain raw mate­ri­als and pro­ducts who­se pro­duc­tion is gene­ral­ly based on defo­re­sta­ti­on and forest degra­dati­on. Unli­ke, for examp­le, the regu­la­ti­on of due dili­gence obli­ga­ti­ons to respect human rights along the sup­ply chain (we repor­ted), the Com­mis­si­on has opted for a regu­la­ti­on that would deve­lop its regu­la­to­ry con­tent direct­ly in all mem­ber sta­tes and thus ensu­re maxi­mum har­mo­ni­sa­ti­on. The aim of this regu­la­ti­on is to pro­mo­te the con­sump­ti­on of and tra­de in cer­tain raw mate­ri­als and pro­ducts that do not lead to defo­re­sta­ti­on and forest degra­dati­on, and in this way to con­tri­bu­te to the con­ser­va­ti­on of biodiversity.

Scope and core regulations

The draft regu­la­ti­on so far regu­la­tes six high-risk com­mo­di­ties that have been iden­ti­fied as signi­fi­cant­ly respon­si­ble for defo­re­sta­ti­on and degra­dati­on of exis­ting vir­gin forests: cof­fee, cocoa, oil palm, soy, catt­le and wood (so-called “rele­vant raw mate­ri­als”). In addi­ti­on, pro­ducts that con­tain, are fed with, or are made from rele­vant raw mate­ri­als (so-called “rele­vant pro­ducts”) are also cove­r­ed. Examp­les inclu­de pro­ducts such as fur­ni­tu­re, lea­ther or cho­co­la­te. Other com­mo­di­ties such as sugar, corn and rub­ber were not cove­r­ed by the draft regu­la­ti­on des­pi­te com­pa­ra­ble effects on glo­bal defo­re­sta­ti­on. With the ent­ry into for­ce of the regu­la­ti­on, the cur­r­ent­ly valid Regu­la­ti­on (EU) No. 995/2010 (Euro­pean Tim­ber Regu­la­ti­on – EUTR), which exclu­si­ve­ly regu­la­tes the lega­li­ty of tim­ber and tim­ber pro­ducts, is to be repealed.

In essence, the pro­po­sed regu­la­ti­on pro­hi­bits tra­de in rele­vant raw mate­ri­als and pro­ducts if they are not deforestation-free, not extrac­ted legal­ly, and not accom­pa­nied by a so-called “due dili­gence decla­ra­ti­on”. In line with the requi­re­ments of the EUTR, mar­ket par­ti­ci­pants are obli­ged to imple­ment a due dili­gence sys­tem (DDS) in order to redu­ce the risk asso­cia­ted with pro­vi­si­on to a negli­gi­ble degree. In this three-tier sys­tem, mar­ket par­ti­ci­pants must collect infor­ma­ti­on on the deforestation-free natu­re and lega­li­ty of raw mate­ri­als along the sup­ply chain, assess iden­ti­fied risks, and imple­ment appro­pria­te risk miti­ga­ti­on pro­ce­du­res as necessa­ry. As a result of this DDS, ope­ra­tors must then decla­re to the com­pe­tent aut­ho­ri­ties that the rele­vant raw mate­ri­als and pro­ducts have been obtai­ned in accordance with the requi­re­ments of the Regu­la­ti­on. In par­al­lel to the cur­rent requi­re­ments of the EUTR, tra­ders of rele­vant raw mate­ri­als and pro­ducts are pri­ma­ri­ly sub­ject to infor­ma­ti­on and docu­men­ta­ti­on requirements.

New­ly envi­sa­ged is an infor­ma­ti­on sys­tem set up by the Com­mis­si­on in the form of a regis­ter in which tra­ders and mar­ket par­ti­ci­pants (tog­e­ther with their regis­tra­ti­on num­bers) as well as their due dili­gence decla­ra­ti­ons are to be registered.

Prac­ti­cal Implications

The legis­la­ti­ve pro­cess is cur­r­ent­ly in the sta­ge of the first rea­ding and con­se­quent­ly still at the begin­ning. It the­re­fo­re remains to be seen when and, if necessa­ry, with what amend­ments the draft will be adop­ted after fur­ther deli­be­ra­ti­on in the Euro­pean Par­lia­ment. It is still con­ceiva­ble, for examp­le, that the scope of the regu­la­ti­on could be exten­ded to inclu­de addi­tio­nal raw mate­ri­als such as corn, sugar and rub­ber and their products.

What is cer­tain, howe­ver, is that the regu­la­ti­on will come, as it is ano­t­her cru­cial cor­ner­stone in the EU’s fight against ille­gal­ly extrac­ted raw mate­ri­als and pro­ducts manu­fac­tu­red based on envi­ron­men­tal and human rights vio­la­ti­ons. Affec­ted com­pa­nies are the­re­fo­re well advi­sed to alrea­dy allo­ca­te human and finan­cial resour­ces to the very time-consuming pro­ces­ses that will be requi­red to imple­ment the requi­re­ments of this new regu­la­ti­on. We will con­ti­nue to report.


Stay up-to-date

We use your e-mail address exclusively for sending our newsletter. You have the right to revoke your consent at any time with effect for the future. For further information, please refer to our privacy policy.