The EU is serious about pro­tec­ting the environment!

Update – Regu­la­ti­on on deforestation-free sup­p­ly chains

The legis­la­ti­ve pro­cess for the pro­po­sed regu­la­ti­on on deforestation-free sup­p­ly chains dated 17 Novem­ber 2021(as we repor­ted) at Green Deal is moving for­ward. The first rea­ding in the ple­na­ry ses­si­on of the EU Par­lia­ment took place on 14 Sep­tem­ber 2022, with mem­bers at the ple­na­ry ses­si­on agre­e­ing to a com­pro­mi­se pro­po­sal that would signi­fi­cant­ly expand the scope of the draft. In June, the Coun­cil of Minis­ters had alre­a­dy published a expl­ana­to­ry memo­ran­dum on the EU Commission’s pro­po­sed regu­la­ti­on, which may speed up the legis­la­ti­ve pro­cess. This shows the rele­van­ce of the issue at the EU level.

Even befo­re the first rea­ding of the draft regu­la­ti­on in the ple­na­ry ses­si­on of the Euro­pean Par­lia­ment, the Coun­cil of the Euro­pean Uni­on had alre­a­dy agreed on a so-called “gene­ral approach” (poli­ti­cal agree­ment) on 28 June 2022, repre­sen­ting the start­ing posi­ti­on for the Council’s fur­ther nego­tia­ti­ons in the legis­la­ti­ve pro­cess. In this con­text, the Coun­cil agreed on a mode­ra­te exten­si­on of the scope of the regu­la­ti­on, so that the rele­vant pro­ducts lis­ted in Annex I will in future also include char­co­al, wood wool and wood flour. Accor­ding to the Council’s memo­ran­dum, bin­ding due dili­gence requi­re­ments should app­ly to all mar­ket par­ti­ci­pan­ts and trad­ers. In pre­pa­ring due dili­gence decla­ra­ti­ons, SMEs are given the opti­on of rely­ing on lar­ger eco­no­mic ope­ra­tors. At the same time, the thres­holds for man­da­to­ry con­trols by com­pe­tent aut­ho­ri­ties and mini­mum con­trol levels were redu­ced. Fur­ther­mo­re, the estab­lish­ment of a bench­mar­king sys­tem was agreed upon accor­ding to which the defo­re­sta­ti­on risk in the EU as well as in third count­ries is to be clas­si­fied into three cate­go­ries: “low”, “nor­mal” and “high”, on which both the scope of the audit inten­si­ty by the aut­ho­ri­ties and the scope of the due dili­gence requi­re­ments to be com­pli­ed with by the eco­no­mic actors are to be based in the future. Moreo­ver, a stron­ger focus was pla­ced on human rights.

The Euro­pean Par­lia­ment also adopted its posi­ti­on in the first rea­ding on 14 Sep­tem­ber 2022, and appro­ved a com­pro­mi­se pro­po­sal from the Parliament’s ENVI Com­mit­tee that is signi­fi­cant­ly stric­ter than the Council’s demands. This pro­vi­des for a signi­fi­cant expan­si­on of the mate­ri­al scope of appli­ca­ti­on and would like to see pork, sheep and goats, poul­try, corn, rub­ber, char­co­al and prin­ted paper pro­ducts regu­la­ted as raw mate­ri­als and/or pro­ducts in the future. Of par­ti­cu­lar prac­ti­cal signi­fi­can­ce is that the appli­ca­ble date by which the new rules must be obser­ved has been moved up by one year from 31 Decem­ber 2020 to 31 Decem­ber 2019, which means that no raw mate­ri­als and/or pro­ducts based on defo­re­sta­ti­on or forest degra­da­ti­on may be pla­ced on the mar­ket after the new regu­la­ti­on comes into force. The­re is agree­ment with the Coun­cil that grea­ter focus must be pla­ced on human rights and the rights of indi­ge­nous peoples.


It remains to be seen whe­ther the Coun­cil will accept the Parliament’s posi­ti­on and adopt the regu­la­ti­on in a time­ly man­ner. What is cer­tain is that a regu­la­ti­on is coming. Howe­ver, due to the obvious­ly mas­si­ve dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween the various posi­ti­ons, fur­ther nego­tia­ti­ons and a second rea­ding in par­lia­ment are likely to be neces­sa­ry, which could take place as ear­ly as within three months. In any case, with the new pro­po­sed regu­la­ti­on, the EU is making it clear that it is very serious about pro­tec­ting the envi­ron­ment and species.


Stay up-to-date

We use your email address exclusively for sending our newsletter. You have the right to revoke your consent at any time with effect for the future. For further information, please refer to our privacy policy.