Way clear for auto­no­mous dri­ving – Update

Clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on in the pre­vious legal framework

The legal frame­work for self-driving vehi­cles has under­go­ne a num­ber of “upgrades” in recent years. In par­ti­cu­lar, the Act Amen­ding the Road Traf­fic Act and the Com­pul­so­ry Insuran­ce Act (Auto­no­mous Dri­ving Act) (PDF only in Ger­man) of 12 July 2021, crea­ted fun­da­men­tal pre­re­qui­si­tes to enab­le auto­no­mous dri­ving on public roads in Ger­ma­ny.  

Aspects that have not been regu­la­ted so far, e.g. tech­ni­cal requi­re­ments, appro­val of the self-driving vehi­cles and due dili­gence requi­re­ments for the per­sons invol­ved in the ope­ra­ti­on, will now be defi­ned by a new regu­la­ti­on. The aim of the Ordi­nan­ce on the Regu­la­ti­on of the Ope­ra­ti­on of Motor Vehi­cles with Auto­ma­ted and Auto­no­mous Dri­ving Func­tions and on the Amend­ment of Road Traf­fic Regu­la­ti­ons (“AFGBV”; the Ordi­nan­ce), which was adop­ted on 23 Febru­a­ry 2022, is to enab­le the regu­lar ope­ra­ti­on of motor vehi­cles with high­ly and ful­ly auto­ma­ted dri­ving func­tions on public roads. 

The Ordi­nan­ce thus sup­ple­ments the exis­ting pro­vi­si­ons and brid­ges the peri­od until the expec­ted har­mo­ni­sa­ti­on in EU law. 

More com­pre­hen­si­ve manu­fac­tu­rer obli­ga­ti­ons and their impact on the sup­ply chain

In addi­ti­on to the issu­an­ce of ope­ra­ting licen­ses as well as per­mits and appro­vals, more exten­si­ve manu­fac­tu­rer obli­ga­ti­ons have also been established.

The Ordi­nan­ce assigns veri­fi­ca­ti­on, mar­ket sur­veil­lan­ce tasks and powers to the Ger­man Federal Motor Vehi­cle Aut­ho­ri­ty to moni­tor the con­for­mi­ty of vehi­cles. Sin­ce the Aut­ho­ri­ty can only per­form the­se tasks and exer­cise the­se powers on the basis of suf­fi­ci­ent infor­ma­ti­on if it has the rele­vant docu­ments avail­ab­le for inspec­tion, manu­fac­tu­rers must pro­vi­de rele­vant docu­ments and infor­ma­ti­on free of char­ge (e.g. grant access to soft­ware used) in accordance with § 5(5) of the Ordi­nan­ce. Wit­hin this frame­work, manu­fac­tu­rers can obli­ge their sup­pliers to keep more exten­si­ve docu­men­ta­ti­on and/or for a lon­ger peri­od of time or char­ge them for the cos­ts of obtai­ning such documentation.

Manu­fac­tu­rers will also be affec­ted by the “tech­ni­cal super­vi­si­on” requi­re­ments set out in § 14 of the Ordi­nan­ce. The owner is respon­si­ble per se for ensu­ring that a sui­ta­ble natu­ral per­son is avail­ab­le for tech­ni­cal super­vi­si­on (§ 13(6), Sen­tence 1 of the Ordi­nan­ce). Howe­ver, the manu­fac­tu­rer must pro­vi­de appro­pria­te trai­ning. Depen­ding on which com­pon­ents and parts of a vehi­cle are affec­ted, it can be assu­med that the manu­fac­tu­rer will also pass on the­se obli­ga­ti­ons, or at least the asso­cia­ted cos­ts, “down the sup­ply chain.”

Out­look and significance

It is expec­ted that manu­fac­tu­rers of auto­no­mous vehi­cles will respond to the new requi­re­ments. The pas­sing on of the obli­ga­ti­ons incum­bent on them and/or, alter­na­tively, the pas­sing on of the cost bur­den to the sup­ply chain can thus be expec­ted – both by con­trac­tu­al means. So once again, it’s the same sto­ry all the way through the sup­ply chain: Watch out when draf­ting con­tracts.

The next legis­la­ti­ve step is the vote of the Federal Coun­cil on the Ordi­nan­ce. If the Coun­cil agrees, the auto indus­try may soon be able to put auto­no­mous dri­ving vehi­cles on the road and in people’s garages.


Stay up-to-date

We use your e-mail address exclusively for sending our newsletter. You have the right to revoke your consent at any time with effect for the future. For further information, please refer to our privacy policy.